Libraries are bridges to information and knowledge.

by

Few issues in American public life generate more political rhetoric, and less public consensus, than the growth of the national debt. Democrats and Republicans alike frequently accuse one another of fiscal irresponsibility, while voters struggle to determine which party has actually contributed more to the nation’s long-term debt burden.

Two recent sources help illuminate this debate from different perspectives: an article distributed by The Epoch Times and an analytical report published by Investopedia titled “Democrats vs. Republicans: Who Had More National Debt?” Together, these sources underscore both the political complexity and the historical nuance surrounding America’s growing fiscal challenges.

According to Investopedia, the United States national debt exceeded $38 trillion in 2025–2026, continuing a decades-long pattern of expansion under administrations of both political parties. The article notes that, when adjusted for inflation and measured per presidential term since 1913, Republican presidents have added slightly more debt on average than Democratic presidents: approximately $1.4 trillion per term versus $1.2 trillion for Democrats. However, Democratic presidents collectively added more total debt overall because Democrats occupied the White House for more years during the period studied.

Continue reading

by

During the week ending May 15, 2026 we have received listings of 17 Government and Administrative Law Summaries,  24 Constitutional Law summaries,  40 Criminal Law Summaries, 1 White Collar Case Summary,  3 Intellectual Property Summaries, 1 Internet Law Summary, 2 Medical Malpractice Summaries, and 2 U.S. Supreme Court Summaries.    We plan is to continue posting opinion summaries, under corresponding areas of law, weekly whenever possible in order to keep blog readers updated.  To gain access to these case summaries, click on the corresponding links below:

Opinion Summaries Posted for Week Ending  May 15 ,2026

Criminal Law

Continue reading

by

The following exchange explores an intriguing and often overlooked dimension of the famous Kurt Gödel citizenship anecdote: whether Gödel’s concerns about the vulnerabilities of the U.S. Constitution may have reflected not simply a fear of formal amendment under Article V, but a deeper concern about how constitutional systems can gradually transform themselves through interpretation, logic, and institutional evolution. After posting my articles about Kurt Godel I asked GPT-5 what I thought was a routine question but it responded with much more. This exchange is the original version, independently reviewed and verified by a reliable source as completely accurate.

BADERTSCHER

Thinking about Godel as a preeminent logician, has anyone considered that in his statements expressing his concerns about vulnerabilities in the U.S. Constitution, he might have been thinking of the possibility of reinterpreting various provisions of the constitution through logic, theorems, etc. in a manner that could bring us closer to a dictatorship over time by bypassing Article V and any form of standard amendment process altogether?

Continue reading

by

Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Report, May 12, 2026.*

CBO estimates that a national missile defense system possessing capabilities broadly consistent with those in the “The Iron Dome for America” executive order would cost about $1.2 trillion to develop, deploy, and operate for 20 years.

SUMMARY:

Continue reading

by

A Congressional Budget Office (CBO) presentation by Phill Swagel, Sean Dunbar, Sarah Masi, and Sarah Sajewski on May 11, 2026

SUMMARY:

“This presentation describes CBO’s February 2026 projections of federal subsidies for health insurance, with a focus on Medicare, Medicaid, and premium tax credits. Projected enrollments in those and other programs are discussed, as are the factors that prompted changes to CBO’s projections since January 2025.”

Continue reading

by

I have chosen to write about this remarkably rich topic because it sits at the intersection of constitutional law, political theory, logic, and history, precisely the kind of issue that invites thoughtful discussion among lawyers, judges, scholars, and legal information professionals.

Although Kurt Gödel never publicly explained the precise “proof” he believed he had discovered, scholars, constitutional theorists, historians, and legal commentators have spent decades trying to reconstruct what he meant when he warned that the U.S. Constitution could legally evolve into a dictatorship.

The story itself is well documented. While preparing for his U.S. citizenship examination in 1947, Gödel intensely studied American constitutional law. According to his friend Oskar Morgenstern, Gödel became alarmed after concluding that there was an “inner contradiction” in the Constitution that could permit a democratic republic to transform legally into an authoritarian regime.

Continue reading

by

As law enforcement agencies confront growing volumes of digital information and increasingly complex investigations, the challenge is no longer simply gathering data,  it is connecting the right information quickly enough to generate actionable intelligence. This upcoming webinar explores how agencies are responding by moving toward more integrated and collaborative investigative environments that improve visibility, coordination, and analytical capability across systems and jurisdictions.

Drawing on real-world operational examples and practitioner insights, the discussion will examine where investigations most commonly stall in fragmented data environments and how connected systems can help investigators identify leads, uncover relationships, and develop cases more efficiently. Panelists will also explore how agencies are leveraging integrated workflows and analytics to accelerate “speed to intelligence” while minimizing additional complexity for investigators already working under demanding conditions.

Among the key issues to be addressed are:

Continue reading

by

During the week ending May 8, 2026 we have received listings of 12 Government and Administrative Law Summaries,  21 Constitutional Law summaries,  67Criminal Law Summaries,   3 Intellectual Property Summaries, and 1 Copyright Law Summary.    We plan is to continue posting opinion summaries, under corresponding areas of law, weekly whenever possible in order to keep blog readers updated.  To gain access to these case summaries, click on the corresponding links below:

Opinion Summaries Posted for Week Ending  May 8 ,2026

Criminal Law

Continue reading

by

The complete article “Your Conversations With AI May Not Be as Private as You Think,” published by Tech Xplore* in May 2026, reports on a study conducted by researchers at the IMDEA Networks Institute examining the privacy practices of leading generative AI platforms, including ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, and Perplexity AI. The researchers found that some AI systems incorporate tracking technologies associated with major technology companies such as Meta, Google, and TikTok, raising concerns about the extent to which user interactions may be monitored or shared with third-party analytics and advertising ecosystems. The following is an overview of the article:

According to the article, the study revealed significant variation in how AI services manage user privacy. While some platforms appeared to limit external tracking mechanisms, others transmitted metadata and usage information that could potentially be used to profile users or monitor behavioral patterns. The researchers emphasized that the concern is not necessarily that full conversations are publicly exposed, but rather that background data collection practices may operate in ways users neither expect nor fully understand.

The article also highlights the growing tendency of users to discuss highly personal, financial, medical, professional, and legal matters with AI systems. In light of this trend, the researchers caution against assuming that conversations with AI platforms are protected by the same confidentiality standards that apply to communications with lawyers, physicians, therapists, or other privileged professionals.

Continue reading

by

OVERVIEW:

The April/May 2026 issue of the American Bar Association Senior Lawyers Division’s Experience Magazine (Volume 36, Issue 3) centers on a unifying and reflective theme: the meaning of the “bucket list” at different stages of life and professional maturity. The issue combines personal essays, reflections on retirement and reinvention, practical professional guidance, and a timely discussion of artificial intelligence in legal practice.

A major theme running throughout the issue is that fulfillment in later life is not necessarily tied to grand adventures or dramatic achievements, but often to purpose, service, mentoring, and appreciation for experiences already gained. Several contributors challenge the traditional notion of a “bucket list” as merely a checklist of destinations or accomplishments. Instead, they encourage readers—particularly senior lawyers—to think about meaning, contribution, relationships, and continued intellectual engagement.

Continue reading
Contact Information
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2016 – 2026, David Badertscher
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design