Articles Posted in David Badertscher

“Google launched its most ambitious AI model called Gemini on Wednesday [December 6, 2023], which is described as Google’s “largest and most capable AI model.” The company announced a “Gemini era” where the model will be used widely in companies and consumer devices like Google Pixel phones. Unlike existing AI models that focus on one type of input like text or images, Gemini is “multimodal” and can accept different types of media like text, images, audio and video as inputs. Google’s AI chatbot Bard has been upgraded with Gemini, and Google plans to add Gemini to widely used products like Search, Chrome and its cloud services”

Benzinga News, December 7,

INTRODUCTION

Yesterday, December 12, 2023, we received an email from Open AI announcing changes to their Terms of Use and Privacy Policy that will make it easier to understand what to expect from Open AI  when you use their services. The changes will become effective on January 31, 2024. Below is a copy of an overview of the updates we are posting for the convenience of our readers. To see the complete documents click on the links below:

FROM OPEN AI:

We want to let you know about some upcoming changes to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. These changes will make it easier for you to understand what to expect from OpenAI as you use our services. The Terms of Use and Privacy Policy will take effect on January 31, 2024.
We encourage you to read the updated policies, but here is a quick overview of some key changes:
Terms of Use
  • Separate business terms. We’ve removed the sections of the Terms of Use that relate to the use of our services for businesses and developers, namely ChatGPT Enterprise and our APIs. We’ve created a new set of Business Terms that apply to those services.
  • Updated arbitration procedures. We’ve updated some of the procedures by which we will resolve any arbitrated disputes.
  • Improved readability. We’ve re-organized and clarified some parts of our Terms of Use (yes, with a little help from ChatGPT) to make them simpler and easier to understand.
Privacy Policy
  • Personal information we collect. We’ve provided additional details and examples about the information we collect, such as when you participate in OpenAI’s events or surveys.
  • Business accounts. We’ve provided information about how administrators of ChatGPT Enterprise and team accounts can access and control accounts associated with their organization.
If you have questions about any of these changes, please see this Help Center FAQ.
You don’t need to take any action in response to this update. By continuing to use our services after January 31, 2024, you are agreeing to the updated Terms of Use and acknowledge that our Privacy Policy applies to data processed in OpenAI’s services. If you do not agree to the updates, you may delete your account.

https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/meips/ADKq_NbRyWIYTEI3LDUzqm4FD1lLFftskCTcchwja5rYuUVL5aK9O4KQXZyS6UtGMXE1qhDrtZ1OZ6TwAcGDO-vv23nlhjTqjPu3s6KF2pPHXW_ebM0pu7K1kmTwGOBA-mWcxTysb2NWWgiQvL4VkHBJ8sLtAUF0mZOQhFkfyr5LHwhKZWbo8Wo-QQLuswHx1WEWBlRl1nZ35HyBJoXu0wtN7UnunyP7KB9AxgYzf1_Z6tyLDju6woQfWoFRATZYNVPWBAgw0Za9OiwPsTsVA6Y_7bCdhzkyUhsbhNj8FUZIpl-bK1I6qurYSVl_vwMGdZGjaoX4b-NDjvpg_GE_mQQBzJh00JRswndUV7Afczue9Yp6arIvQBNvUu4Ks0z0rbwW949DWEIzZ0vp1zgSQ8vzrwaeKoOfbitizB0Yeo3rzhsIlQIL8yn4YxlbT5GJd1N4hSbLSGXUOP6jnOHdceDNo6bxx9vKfNXXOFLcgv7ONHUrTO2f-avdJL3f1QVIXDkcUNN-QMNaZzczWS5PEYagOzYdMS6MKvX3J6JHygCIVBzSJ8bvpIKCk2UvKgC9yxycbQ2ZF-RPOwv2WxKtI5RCO9fruYzH05Zclkxr8aYx8eQRkd1753fJuT4o1EsqVfbZFnH6IZjPQ8TpxIBSK3TbxmRIYX0ja_KCQAIyjJwU2hQOJgZCa5xIKFChpwtu-i3NLsqrvO23BVMYqRvodIhAFH2z_0gtjYWJ3pxuqah9EuvWXQJ3C6Ue6a-KkqupKfZrUTt75Siwe6fYLGMOqjLVhclf2UcrHScaHMnLFYuRTzGBB5wsjS5A2rvjJffVQQh5pWB68gVUFyD0Y7fWgEwa4D2yi_QVsNOZecl3aBMO7-DwFzG56vz0Z8YWfDTocFWU0ST_KHQhEcZ2bRcJN3d8S0mbd3rzmwUJioX0aHYZv7vxpwMqAdMGTsauFLz-WUCT4t31UkggjxkhjNc2NSEEZdTxNZEBfiqLIIBNuH7hIH4_EfYZNaRoMYrZeTMfg4DibkGOMYKF1_wmhhlOzRPf2VlUbKkDMtOW5YdvLf8fZTBCPoawZFOjqGyktgqPUcRf-JL6LTeCQVM0ObKKiQ31Rp-U-S8-VxqI_NaH2g1zu8Fj3prSKVUNDGk0JeAKemvRstgHaqlN_sJJxWQnS0BbHAH9lKKBMP0MPu6t5E-frQu9Giw66BgAP774vGO9E09Jo0oFW842Ctin8mFVPCCBiVN9YUIMvLjADqhIdIInu6zy7DjnCnFGfE45OZFbQwf9y8uV_Xws-LvuP1xG1ITuUiTlQQkrnYXcHKAkUmAdIkSrbz1HwgCSvKoMY0MjHn-mE8d7w_FVUxIc2TthquXxfp9DuIbH4W95o0h1Hi1lLZc0oREGlnRCyfxpf_V8hlb28sV-GpwqyUE30YdMTvqhdeCR4tw7emnkWn2pennJXh8=s0-d-e1-ft#http://url3243.email.openai.com/wf/open?upn=Fj6r44LzlWiaPcW06LRJfeeixz7fkSE2fiawiaEmUVE1aIXhpxB7W2tKLsD9lj1WpjbrdLHCWRiJYKI0dFln0Vbl0g4VqkM4S31tm4Z2jVICJCgnMRkvc7LgVKK3KB2cyLSjxrJhXCeSILlFD3gkQYwF1SWiXUB-2Fd5jeM4vn2Qbl0L2Kme7sKUxY7Kcw1cRYIiGEXyX3VhSR3Kl7j0jEwF9YkPMv4y6xpKO8AcwMqDcdkcr4sCdJbZgW5V511Vgzf5-2F0kGja-2FjjjxsnedF-2BwJtWX5S9Kp9Uc8Vozqfj5Dn-2FIdMSt9tOGIOqr9hdT2If-2BQAu3Mv-2Fu0CUUjfo5RDZyLvEUEkdicad25er38qyVXARiyqDMnqT-2B7lnqQHjnSHSHy6TEOvxHQUtIlixuw9Tra9iM8yPVn2uOy7vKb-2Bh8HwWlj-2FFnWj1sarZiTPXoX-2FhkpS6eQSYm36UmIkJDjBIddRyQF3bbcJaYIRHoSCleinC5guIzTB54QOLAwQb9hYGFJFyawoqXBKa069Qa4GwNqoQzxgGcbxcta0mBfW2EFkxYFxgNQxOZ0-2FjmCG1hNFt-2BrI3vFFo6Tn2HKZ-2FftsnEervoPCGmznUC9Zaj-2FlvJhShlf9ZtPuG3rMu6BFVuN5Umdy7-2FoPTnqC5WTGx7za4CytsWK-2Bk3TPh7HOe2zMUKXuUeAfJ-2B-2BzO-2Bvh8DeRPsXWs2sE2F5SolIMu4h5Tur0x4GdG-2BUqsOjPyJgBfr7iV4sXMqxRzzTY-2B6DlEwKc0hZPgDTmmy3GnHfYS3Kf5IJvpMRUcAu4TP2DIsLNyAPnmruUcx66VCZTdWXbMRSIoK-2F-2BcWRq-2B-2FikKMltE2t29MFZScEW1mSxiR78Mq-2F-2FwH3ls6lb47T9Ct-2ByoAoCobMRYy-2BY4oB11J0yoounvjnGEinGxSi5atEG0kq5NBtcQQuQL2w5PIwxt0ZkEWOIcrGa8pWtzb

Introduction.

This posting provides information to help explore the key arguments surrounding this question from both positive and negative perspectives and to provide a useful framework to inform the debate.  Commentary is organized into the following categories: Survey Information, Historical Context, Current Challenges, Arguments for a New Constitutional Convention, Arguments Against Convening a New Constitutional Convention, Alternative Considerations, Some Thoughts About the Future, and a concluding statement. The scope of this posting is limited to U.S constitutional conventions; it does not cover the separate topic of state constitutional conventions which are treated separately. The U.S. Constitution cannot be changed through state-level initiatives; only the federal government, through a process involving Congress and state ratification, can amend the Constitution, meaning state initiatives cannot directly modify it.

The United States Constitution, adopted in 1787, has endured for over two centuries as the foundational document governing the nation. However, in recent years there has been growing debate over whether it is time to convene a new Constitutional Convention to address contemporary challenges and issues.

In a previous posting on this blog, Reflections of a Retired Law Librarian: From Mimeograph to Generative AI, I urged professional organizations, including the American Bar Association (ABA) and the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL), to appoint committees or commissions at the highest level to  facilitate the development and implementation of standards sufficient to address the real ethical and safety concerns related  to the increasingly rapid adaption of AI, including  Generative AI, as a technology of choice in the workplace.

It is gratifying to learn from recent announcements from the American Bar Association that it has already been taking steps to address the legal challenges of Ai faced by the legal community. As Mary L. Smith, President of the American Bar Association, has said: “As a national voice for the legal profession, the ABA must play a  leadership role in helping to identify for the legal community the benefits and risks of continually changing AI and machine learning systems and capabilities.”

Measures already taken by ABA include Resolution 112 adopted in August, 2019, Resolution 604 adopted in February, 2023, various articles and podcasts published by its various Sections, including the ABA Business Law Section and the Sci Tech Lawyer published by the ABA Science and Technology Section.

Generative AI is a type of artificial intelligence technology that can produce various types of content, including text, imagery, audio and information that is artificially manufactured. The recent interest in generative AI has been driven by the simplicity of new user interfaces for creating high-quality content, including text, graphics and videos in a matter of seconds.                        

Generative AI has the potential to be used in various ways to help regulate criminal behavior, although it’s important to note that these applications can be controversial and raise ethical concerns. Here are some ways in which generative AI could potentially contribute to regulating criminal behavior:

  1. Predictive Policing: Generative AI algorithms could analyze large sets of historical crime data to identify patterns and predict potential criminal hotspots. This could help law enforcement agencies allocate resources more effectively and proactively deter criminal behavior.

New from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

Cost Estimate, August 23. 2023

As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, July 30, 2023

Introduction: The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the practice of executing individuals who have been convicted of certain serious crimes, typically murder. The United States has a complex and controversial history with the death penalty, involving legal, ethical, and societal considerations. This posting provides an overview of the death penalty in the United States, including its history, current status, arguments for and against its use,  recent trends. and a selection of death penalty, criminal sentencing  Supreme Court cases compiled by Justia, and a list of references for the benefit of those who would like to pursue this subject in greater depth and detail.

Historical Context: The death penalty has been a part of the U.S. legal system since colonial times.  The first recorded execution in the new colonies was believed to be that of Captain George Kendall in the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1608. Over the years, the application of the death penalty has evolved  with changes in methods of execution and legal standards. Use of the death penalty in the United States rose gradually during the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth  centuries with a sharp rise in the twentieth century until 1972 when a moratorium was established by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Furman v. Georgia.

Modern Era and Legal Framework: In 1972 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Furman v. Georgia that the death penalty, as it was being applied at the time, was unconstitutional due to its arbitrary nature. Subsequently, many states revised their laws to address concerns of arbitrariness and excessive severity. In 1976 the Court reinstated the death penalty with the Gregg v. Georgia decision, in which it as held that death penalty for murder was not, in and of itself, a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on May 17, 2023

This bill would:

• Authorize the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to provide danger pay allowances to employees who

Cyber risk is one of the great concerns sitting at the top of any government, as hacker attacks and other security breaches have the potential to jeopardize the global economy and other aspects of everyday life.  Wide reporting indicates the proliferation of cyber attacks worldwide at a substantial and increasing rate, thereby unleashing severe damage to companies, governments and individuals worldwide. This proliferation of widespread attacks is creating an increasingly urgent need for greater cybersecurity for those in all sectors utilizing online networks.  Users include governments, corporations, various other organizations  and individuals who stand to benefit from the greater convenience, efficiencies, and sometimes cost benefits made available through online use.

Cyber criminals and others in the business of victimizing online users also benefit.  While some may be primarily interested in creating mischief, which can itself prove harmful, professional cybercriminals are usually looking for much more. Usually, the basis of their primary motives comes down to either money or power. For purposes of classification, their motives are typically  grouped into one or more of the following three categories:

  1. Denial of Service. The motive for this type of attack is usually revenge. Some attackers may launch DDoS attacks as retaliation against a person, organization, or business that they perceive has wronged them. Some attackers may similarly target a competing business or organization to disrupt their services and gain an advantage in the market.

CBO’s Director, Phillip Swagel, testifies about the agency’s projections of Social Security’s finances before the Senate Budget Committee.

Established in 1974, The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is a federal agency within the legislative branch of the United States government.  It is charged with providing  members of Congress  objective  analysis of budgeting and economic issues to support the congressional budget process. Each year, CBO economists and budget analysts produce dozens of reports and hundreds of cost estimates for proposed legislation. This posting includes a summary of Director Swagel’s testimony, a link to the full text of the testimony, and a list of publications that relate to the testimony.

Summary:

Contact Information