Articles Posted in Legal News and Views

Theo AI, a cutting-edge generative AI (genAI) startup based in the United States, has positioned itself as the first predictive AI platform designed specifically for litigation. Backed by an impressive $2.2 million in pre-seed funding, the company aims to achieve what no other legal tech firm has successfully accomplished: accurately predicting the outcomes of legal disputes well before their resolution.

The concept of AI-driven litigation prediction is not entirely new—Artificial Lawyer has been reporting on similar applications since 2016. However, Theo AI’s innovative use of genAI technology marks a significant departure from earlier approaches, potentially setting a new benchmark in the field of legal technology.

From Artificial  Lawyer  November 2024:

December 12, 2024.

These Legal News Briefs and Decision Summaries are an exclusive benefit of the New Jersey Bar Association (NJSBA) in  partnership with the New Jersey Law Journal (NJLJ). A subscription may be necessary to access the full text of some articles. Click on any decision listed to get the full opinion.

NEWS BRIEFS:

The American Bar Association Council for Diversity in the Educational is thrilled to announce the recipients of the 2025 Raymond Pace and Sadie Tanner Mossell Alexander Awards for Excellence in Pipeline Diversity. These awards honor the legacy of Raymond Pace Alexander, the first African American graduate of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a trailblazing judge, and Sadie Tanner Mossell Alexander, the first African American woman to earn a Ph.D. in the United States and the first woman to receive a law degree from the University of Pennsylvania.

Congratulations to the 2025 Alexander Awards Recipients!

About Jurimetrics Journal:

The Jurimetrics Journal is published quarterly  “Jurimetrics is the oldest and most widely circulated peer-reviewed journal in its field and is proud to be the official journal of the American Bar Association Science & Technology Law Section. Currently, the journal is housed at the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University (ASU Law) and cosponsored by ASU Law’s Center for Law, Science and Innovation (LSI). An LSI Center faculty fellow advises the Jurimetrics executive board and editorial staff. The journal provides scholars and researchers with a wealth of thoughtful articles. It is frequently cited in opinions of state and federal courts, legal treatises, textbooks, and scholarly articles in a wide range of other journals. These distinctions support Jurimetrics’ claim of being the premier peer-reviewed journal of law, science, and technology.”

From the Spring 2024 issue:

A New Jersey Institute of Legal Education (NJICLE) event sponsored by the New Jersey State Bar Association.

Date: December 19, 2024, 9:00AM – 12:00PM.

Location: New Jersey Law Center, New Brunswick and Online.

The following is a discussion of the book Gitlow v. New York: Every Idea an Incitement. In his study, Marc Lendler opens up the world of American radicalism, traces the origin of the incorporation doctrine, which was addressed for the first time in this case, and the ebb and flow of Gitlow as a precedent through the Cold War and beyond.  Gitlow v. New York: Every Idea an Incitement is a book for our time.

In 1919 American Communist Party member Benjamin Gitlow was arrested for distributing a “Left Wing Manifesto,” a publication inspired by the Russian Revolution. He was charged with violating New York’s Criminal Anarchy Law of 1902, which outlawed the advocacy of any doctrine advocating for the violent overthrow of government. Gitlow argued that the law violated his right to free speech, but he was still convicted. He appealed  the decision; however, five years later the Supreme Court upheld his sentence by a vote of 7-2.

Throughout the legal proceedings, much attention was devoted to the “bad tendency” doctrine—the idea that speakers and writers were responsible for the probable effects of their words—which the Supreme Court explicitly endorsed in its decision. According to Justice Edward T. Sanford, “A state may punish utterances endangering the foundations of organized government and threatening its overthrow by unlawful means.”

American Bar Association:

Register for the upcoming webinar, Prosecutorial Independence and the Rule of Law, at: www.americanbar.org/events-cle/mtg/web/445186848/

“We are living in a pivotal moment when democratic norms and the rule of law are being challenged in novel and unexpected ways as we struggle to adapt to rapid technological and cultural changes that have changed our relationships and dialogue with each other.  In maintaining the rule of law, prosecutorial discretion and independence are essential. Yet not everyone believes that prosecutorial independence exists or understands why it matters. In this panel, former Department of Justice leaders and veteran prosecutors will explore recent challenges to prosecutorial independence and the rule of law at the federal level, including the Project 2025 proposal by the Heritage Foundation.”

News Briefs From the New Jersey State BarAssociation

Med Mal Claim Over Partial Vision Loss Nets $2.5 Million Settlement

A Westampton woman has reached a $2.5 million settlement in a medical malpractice case in which an allegedly delayed glaucoma diagnosis led to permanent partial sight loss.

 

Capitol Report: New Jersey State Bar Association Amicus Cases Up for Oral Argument

This week’s Capitol Report covers the NJSBA’s amicus advocacy on issues related to attorney advertising and removing the “Not Established” standard in child welfare matters. Read the full report here.

 

Can Expunged Records Be Used in Child Abuse Cases?

May an expunged criminal record ever be used against a defendant? Yes, said the Supreme Court on July 31,2024. N.J. Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. A.P., __ N.J.___( 2024), (A-14-23).

 

Join the NJSBA for its Annual Open House and Networking Reception

The NJSBA will host a free networking event on Oct. 10, open to members and prospective members alike. Bring your friends, meet colleagues, expand your business and personal network and learn how to make the most of your NJSBA membership. Plus, attendees can get a free professional headshot. Register here.

 

NJ Justices Mull Insurer’s Duty to Defend Employer’s Negligence Claim in Workers’ Comp Dispute

On the first day of its new term Monday, the New Jersey Supreme Court weighed whether there was an obligation for an insurer to defend an employer accused of negligence claims brought by an employee who had received workers’ compensation benefits.

BOLTS* “ The Texas supreme court closed out 2023 by blocking an abortion during a medical emergency, forcing a woman to flee the state. Just days before Christmas, Wisconsin justices struck down the state’s GOP-drawn gerrymanders. So far this year, Montana’s supreme court has stepped in to protect voting rights, while a decision in Alabama threatened in vitro fertilization treatments. 

In each of these states, unlike at the federal level, voters chose who sits on the bench and which judges get to dictate such profound consequences. And the 2024 elections may now reshape who holds power on supreme courts across the country.

Thirty-three states have elections for their high courts this year; some have as many as five or six seats on the ballot. In total, 82 seats are up for voters to decide. 

Contact Information